You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Coblation versus mechanical shaver debridement in patients following knee chondroplasty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00240-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ayoade Adeyemi, Leo Nherera, Paul Trueman, Anil Ranawat |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Psychology | 2 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,007,778
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#188
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,100
of 416,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.