You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic evaluation of task-shifting approaches to the dispensing of anti-retroviral therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-10-32 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicola Foster, Diane McIntyre |
Abstract |
A scarcity of human resources for health has been identified as one of the primary constraints to the scale-up of the provision of Anti-Retroviral Treatment (ART). In South Africa there is a particularly severe lack of pharmacists. The study aims to compare two task-shifting approaches to the dispensing of ART: Indirectly Supervised Pharmacist's Assistants (ISPA) and Nurse-based pharmaceutical care models against the standard of care which involves a pharmacist dispensing ART. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 27% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,165,601
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#580
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,471
of 187,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.