Title |
ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic: When is it justified?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03386-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Silver Heinsar, Giles J. Peek, John F. Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 12% |
Spain | 5 | 12% |
Italy | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Grenada | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 49% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,474,120
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,290
of 6,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,504
of 516,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#30
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.