↓ Skip to main content

Cohort profile: why do people keep hurting their back?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cohort profile: why do people keep hurting their back?
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13104-020-05356-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Klyne, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Mary F. Barbe, Jacek Cholewicki, Leanne M. Hall, Asaduzzaman Khan, Roberto Meroni, G. Lorimer Moseley, Michael Nicholas, Lee O’Sullivan, Rachel Park, Glen Russell, Michele Sterling, Paul W. Hodges

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,952,191
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#238
of 4,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,059
of 507,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.