You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cohort profile: why do people keep hurting their back?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13104-020-05356-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David M. Klyne, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Mary F. Barbe, Jacek Cholewicki, Leanne M. Hall, Asaduzzaman Khan, Roberto Meroni, G. Lorimer Moseley, Michael Nicholas, Lee O’Sullivan, Rachel Park, Glen Russell, Michele Sterling, Paul W. Hodges |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 10 | 37% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Ghana | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,952,191
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#238
of 4,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,059
of 507,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.