You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sharing genomic data from clinical testing with researchers: public survey of expectations of clinical genomic data management in Queensland, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00563-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miranda E. Vidgen, Sid Kaladharan, Eva Malacova, Cameron Hurst, Nicola Waddell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 80% |
| Austria | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,121,249
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#599
of 1,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,998
of 507,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.