You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised controlled feasibility study of interpersonal art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in people with intellectual disabilities in secure care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00703-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon S. Hackett, Ania Zubala, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Thomas Chadwick, Toni Leigh Harrison, Jane Bourne, Mark Freeston, Andrew Jahoda, John L. Taylor, Cono Ariti, Rachel McNamara, Lindsay Pennington, Elaine McColl, Eileen Kaner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,198,554
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#543
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,830
of 507,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.