You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Popcorn is more satiating than potato chips in normal-weight adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Von Nguyen, Lisa Cooper, Joshua Lowndes, Kathleen Melanson, Theodore J Angelopoulos, James M Rippe, Kristin Reimers |
| Abstract |
Strategies that may increase compliance to reduced energy intakes are needed to reduce the health burden of obesity. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effects of snacking on satiety and energy intake. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 14% |
| Japan | 7 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Finland | 3 | 4% |
| Turkey | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 17% |
| Scientists | 9 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 21% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 391. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#79,561
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#29
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318
of 188,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.