↓ Skip to main content

GalaxyTBM: template-based modeling by building a reliable core and refining unreliable local regions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GalaxyTBM: template-based modeling by building a reliable core and refining unreliable local regions
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junsu Ko, Hahnbeom Park, Chaok Seok

Abstract

Protein structures can be reliably predicted by template-based modeling (TBM) when experimental structures of homologous proteins are available. However, it is challenging to obtain structures more accurate than the single best templates by either combining information from multiple templates or by modeling regions that vary among templates or are not covered by any templates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Chemistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,820
of 7,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,105
of 167,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#92
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.