You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of distal radius fractures involving the distal radioulnar articular joint on forearm rotation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-020-02091-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lingde Kong, Meng Fu, Jian Lu, Yanqing Zhou, Zuzhuo Zhang, Bing Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 43% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,882,613
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#194
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,817
of 507,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.