↓ Skip to main content

Mood color choice helps to predict response to hypnotherapy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mood color choice helps to predict response to hypnotherapy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen R Carruthers, Julie Morris, Nicholas Tarrier, Peter J Whorwell

Abstract

Approximately two thirds of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) respond well to hypnotherapy. However, it is time consuming as well as expensive to provide and therefore a way of predicting outcome would be extremely useful. The use of imagery and color form an integral part of the hypnotherapeutic process and we have hypothesised that investigating color and how it relates to mood might help to predict response to treatment. In order to undertake this study we have previously developed and validated a method of presenting colors to individuals for research purposes called the Manchester Color Wheel (MCW). Using this instrument we have been able to classify colors into positive, neutral and negative shades and this study aimed to assess their predictive role in hypnotherapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,965
of 3,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,881
of 180,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.