↓ Skip to main content

SARS-CoV-2-associated encephalitis: arguments for a post-infectious mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
SARS-CoV-2-associated encephalitis: arguments for a post-infectious mechanism
Published in
Critical Care, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03389-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrien Picod, Vera Dinkelacker, Julien Savatovsky, Pierre Trouiller, Antoine Guéguen, Nicolas Engrand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,542,476
of 22,530,935 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,559
of 5,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,441
of 505,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#316
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,530,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.