| Title |
SARS-CoV-2-associated encephalitis: arguments for a post-infectious mechanism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03389-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrien Picod, Vera Dinkelacker, Julien Savatovsky, Pierre Trouiller, Antoine Guéguen, Nicolas Engrand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iraq | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,328,348
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,064
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,142
of 529,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.