| Title |
Capacity of National Malaria Control Programmes to implement vector surveillance: a global analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03493-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya L. Russell, Robert Farlow, Myo Min, Effie Espino, Abraham Mnzava, Thomas R. Burkot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Malawi | 2 | 3% |
| Cameroon | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Kenya | 2 | 3% |
| Niger | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 57% |
| Scientists | 16 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#930,873
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#110
of 5,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,302
of 518,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.