↓ Skip to main content

Building momentum for malaria vaccine research and development: key considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Building momentum for malaria vaccine research and development: key considerations
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03491-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chetan E. Chitnis, David Schellenberg, Johan Vekemans, Edwin J. Asturias, Philip Bejon, Katharine A. Collins, Brendan S. Crabb, Socrates Herrera, Miriam Laufer, N. Regina Rabinovich, Meta Roestenberg, Adelaide Shearley, Halidou Tinto, Marian Wentworth, Kate O’Brien, Pedro Alonso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 22 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,418,230
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,349
of 5,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,586
of 508,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#45
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.