↓ Skip to main content

Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey

Overview of attention for article published in Autoimmunity Highlights, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
Published in
Autoimmunity Highlights, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieve Van Hoovels, Sylvia Broeders, Edward K. L. Chan, Luis Andrade, Wilson de Melo Cruvinel, Jan Damoiseaux, Markku Viander, Manfred Herold, Wim Coucke, Ingmar Heijnen, Dimitrios Bogdanos, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Catharina Eriksson, Ana Kozmar, Liisa Kuhi, Carolien Bonroy, Bernard Lauwerys, Sofie Schouwers, Laurence Lutteri, Martine Vercammen, Miroslav Mayer, Dina Patel, William Egner, Kari Puolakka, Andrea Tesija-Kuna, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Maria José Rego de Sousa, Marcos Lopez Hoyos, Antonella Radice, Xavier Bossuyt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,771,452
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Autoimmunity Highlights
#71
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,568
of 508,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autoimmunity Highlights
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.