↓ Skip to main content

Current practices in treatment of female genital fistula: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current practices in treatment of female genital fistula: a cross sectional study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-10-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven D Arrowsmith, Joseph Ruminjo, Evelyn G Landry

Abstract

Maternal outcomes in most countries of the developed world are good. However, in many developing/resource-poor countries, maternal outcomes are bleaker: Every year, more than 500,000 women die in childbirth, mostly in resource-poor countries. Those who survive often suffer from severe and long-term morbidities. One of the most devastating injuries is obstetric fistula, occurring most often in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Fistula treatment and care are available in many countries across Africa and Asia, but there is a lack of reliable data around clinical factors associated with the success of fistula repair surgery. Most published research has been retrospective. While these studies have provided useful information about the care and treatment of fistula, they are limited by the design. This study was designed to identify practices in care that could lead to the design of prospective and randomized controlled trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 25%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,147,096
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,171
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,625
of 100,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.