↓ Skip to main content

The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 2,476)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12974-020-02024-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole D. Schartz, Andrea J. Tenner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 38 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 43 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#144,445
of 21,407,661 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#5
of 2,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,598
of 496,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,407,661 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.