You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12974-020-02024-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole D. Schartz, Andrea J. Tenner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 116 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 47 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 123 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#172,871
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#7
of 2,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,249
of 509,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.