You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cross-sectional analysis of how young adults perceive tobacco brands: implications for FCTC signatories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-796 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Gendall, Janet Hoek, Richard Edwards, Judith McCool |
| Abstract |
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control calls for the elimination of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. To test whether tobacco packaging functions as advertising by communicating attractive and distinctive brand attributes, we explored how young adult smokers and non-smokers interpreted familiar and unfamiliar tobacco brands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Thailand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,555,602
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,212
of 16,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,615
of 179,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#62
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.