You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatment of Metabolic syndrome by combination of physical activity and diet needs an optimal protein intake: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-72 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frédéric Dutheil, Gérard Lac, Daniel Courteix, Eric Doré, Robert Chapier, Laurence Roszyk, Vincent Sapin, Bruno Lesourd |
| Abstract |
The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for protein intake has been set at 1.0-1.3 g/kg/day for senior. To date, no consensus exists on the lower threshold intake (LTI = RDA/1.3) for the protein intake (PI) needed in senior patients ongoing both combined caloric restriction and physical activity treatment for metabolic syndrome. Considering that age, caloric restriction and exercise are three increasing factors of protein need, this study was dedicated to determine the minimal PI in this situation, through the determination of albuminemia that is the blood marker of protein homeostasis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,385,561
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#771
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,585
of 170,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.