You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors influencing dietary practices in a transitioning food environment: a cross-sectional exploration of four dietary typologies among rural and urban Ugandan women using Photovoice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00634-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carolyn I. Auma, Rebecca Pradeilles, Megan K. Blake, David Musoke, Michelle Holdsworth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
Uganda | 4 | 24% |
Belgium | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 64 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 70 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,605,836
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#574
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,294
of 508,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.