↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomes and metatranscriptomes from the L4 long-term coastal monitoring station in the Western English Channel

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metagenomes and metatranscriptomes from the L4 long-term coastal monitoring station in the Western English Channel
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, October 2010
DOI 10.4056/sigs.1202536
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack A. Gilbert, Folker Meyer, Lynn Schriml, Ian R. Joint, Martin Mühling, Dawn Field

Abstract

Both metagenomic data and metatranscriptomic data were collected from surface water (0-2m) of the L4 sampling station (50.2518 N, 4.2089 W), which is part of the Western Channel Observatory long-term coastal-marine monitoring station. We previously generated from this area a six-year time series of 16S rRNA V6 data, which demonstrated robust seasonal structure for the bacterial community, with diversity correlated with day length. Here we describe the features of these metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. We generated 8 metagenomes (4.5 million sequences, 1.9 Gbp, average read-length 350 bp) and 7 metatranscriptomes (392,632 putative mRNA-derived sequences, 159 Mbp, average read-length 272 bp) for eight time-points sampled in 2008. These time points represent three seasons (winter, spring, and summer) and include both day and night samples. These data demonstrate the major differences between genetic potential and actuality, whereby genomes follow general seasonal trends yet with surprisingly little change in the functional potential over time; transcripts tended to be far more structured by changes occurring between day and night.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 4%
France 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 69 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 55%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,149,874
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#107
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,218
of 109,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them