You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul M Wilson, Mark Petticrew, Mike W Calnan, Irwin Nazareth |
| Abstract |
Addressing deficiencies in the dissemination and transfer of research-based knowledge into routine clinical practice is high on the policy agenda both in the UK and internationally.However, there is lack of clarity between funding agencies as to what represents dissemination. Moreover, the expectations and guidance provided to researchers vary from one agency to another. Against this background, we performed a systematic scoping to identify and describe any conceptual/organising frameworks that could be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 54% |
| Scientists | 10 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 727 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 2% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 684 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 123 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 16% |
| Researcher | 107 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 8% |
| Other | 164 | 23% |
| Unknown | 99 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 124 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 105 | 14% |
| Psychology | 86 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 128 | 18% |
| Unknown | 123 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,850,797
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#345
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,390
of 188,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.