↓ Skip to main content

Animal models and conserved processes

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 272)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Animal models and conserved processes
Published in
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-4682-9-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray Greek, Mark J Rice

Abstract

The concept of conserved processes presents unique opportunities for using nonhuman animal models in biomedical research. However, the concept must be examined in the context that humans and nonhuman animals are evolved, complex, adaptive systems. Given that nonhuman animals are examples of living systems that are differently complex from humans, what does the existence of a conserved gene or process imply for inter-species extrapolation?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 11 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,918,707
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#47
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,390
of 141,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them