| Title |
Rapid evidence review of harm reduction interventions and messaging for people who inject drugs during pandemic events: implications for the ongoing COVID-19 response
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12954-020-00445-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Wilkinson, Lindsey Hines, Adam Holland, Sema Mandal, Emily Phipps |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
| Canada | 5 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Ireland | 2 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,395,623
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#222
of 1,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,115
of 519,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.