You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Propensity score-matched analysis of systemic chemotherapy versus salvage hysterectomy for persistent cervical cancer after definitive radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-020-07672-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Munetaka Takekuma, Fumiaki Takahashi, Seiji Mabuchi, Wataru Kudaka, Koji Horie, Mariko Ikeda, Ayumi Shikama, Akira Mitsuhashi, Shoji Nagao, Shiro Suzuki, Mika Mizuno, Shin Nishio, Hideki Tokunaga, Yukinobu Ota, Takahiro Kasamatsu, Ryo Kitagawa, Takafumi Toita, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Nobuo Yaegashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,774,803
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,510
of 8,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,862
of 508,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#71
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,430 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.