↓ Skip to main content

Whole blood co-expression modules associate with metabolic traits and type 2 diabetes: an IMI-DIRECT study

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole blood co-expression modules associate with metabolic traits and type 2 diabetes: an IMI-DIRECT study
Published in
Genome Medicine, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13073-020-00806-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valborg Gudmundsdottir, Helle Krogh Pedersen, Gianluca Mazzoni, Kristine H. Allin, Anna Artati, Joline W. Beulens, Karina Banasik, Caroline Brorsson, Henna Cederberg, Elizaveta Chabanova, Federico De Masi, Petra J. Elders, Ian Forgie, Giuseppe N. Giordano, Harald Grallert, Ramneek Gupta, Mark Haid, Torben Hansen, Tue H. Hansen, Andrew T. Hattersley, Alison Heggie, Mun-Gwan Hong, Angus G. Jones, Robert Koivula, Tarja Kokkola, Markku Laakso, Peter Løngreen, Anubha Mahajan, Andrea Mari, Timothy J. McDonald, Donna McEvoy, Petra B. Musholt, Imre Pavo, Cornelia Prehn, Hartmut Ruetten, Martin Ridderstråle, Femke Rutters, Sapna Sharma, Roderick C. Slieker, Ali Syed, Juan Fernandez Tajes, Cecilia Engel Thomas, Henrik S. Thomsen, Jagadish Vangipurapu, Henrik Vestergaard, Ana Viñuela, Agata Wesolowska-Andersen, Mark Walker, Jerzy Adamski, Jochen M. Schwenk, Mark I. McCarthy, Ewan Pearson, Emmanouil Dermitzakis, Paul W. Franks, Oluf Pedersen, Søren Brunak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,227,444
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#958
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,444
of 529,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.