↓ Skip to main content

Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01530-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Taylor-Rowan, Sara Nafisi, Amit Patel, Jennifer K. Burton, Terry J. Quinn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Psychology 3 14%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,883,814
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#998
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,991
of 509,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#27
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.