↓ Skip to main content

Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12931-020-01576-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Flandes, Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid, Javier Alfayate, Iker Fernández-Navamuel, Carlos Agusti, Carmen M. Lucena, Antoni Rosell, Felipe Andreo, Carmen Centeno, Carmen Montero, Iria Vidal, Lucía García-Alfonso, Antonio Bango, Miguel Ariza, Rocío Gallego, Marta Orta, Salvador Bello, Elisa Mincholé, Alfons Torrego, Virginia Pajares, Héctor González, Aurelio Luis Wangüemert, Julio Pérez-Izquierdo, Carlos Disdier, Blanca de Vega Sanchez, Rosa Cordovilla, Juan Cascón, Antonio Cruz, J. Javier García-López, Luis Puente, Paola Benedetti, Cristina L. García-Gallo, Gema Díaz Nuevo, Silvia Aguado, Concepción Partida, Prudencio Díaz-Agero, Estefanía Luque Crespo, María Pavón, Francisco Páez, Enrique Cases, Raquel Martínez, Andrés Briones, Cleofe Fernández, Concepción Martín Serrano, Ana Maria Uribe-Hernández, Jose Robles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Librarian 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,967,298
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#706
of 2,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,195
of 516,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#22
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.