↓ Skip to main content

Integrating epigenomic data and 3D genomic structure with a new measure of chromatin assortativity

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating epigenomic data and 3D genomic structure with a new measure of chromatin assortativity
Published in
Genome Biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-1003-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera Pancaldi, Enrique Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau, Biola Maria Javierre, David Juan, Peter Fraser, Mikhail Spivakov, Alfonso Valencia, Daniel Rico

Abstract

Network analysis is a powerful way of modeling chromatin interactions. Assortativity is a network property used in social sciences to identify factors affecting how people establish social ties. We propose a new approach, using chromatin assortativity, to integrate the epigenomic landscape of a specific cell type with its chromatin interaction network and thus investigate which proteins or chromatin marks mediate genomic contacts. We use high-resolution promoter capture Hi-C and Hi-Cap data as well as ChIA-PET data from mouse embryonic stem cells to investigate promoter-centered chromatin interaction networks and calculate the presence of specific epigenomic features in the chromatin fragments constituting the nodes of the network. We estimate the association of these features with the topology of four chromatin interaction networks and identify features localized in connected areas of the network. Polycomb group proteins and associated histone marks are the features with the highest chromatin assortativity in promoter-centered networks. We then ask which features distinguish contacts amongst promoters from contacts between promoters and other genomic elements. We observe higher chromatin assortativity of the actively elongating form of RNA polymerase 2 (RNAPII) compared with inactive forms only in interactions between promoters and other elements. Contacts among promoters and between promoters and other elements have different characteristic epigenomic features. We identify a possible role for the elongating form of RNAPII in mediating interactions among promoters, enhancers, and transcribed gene bodies. Our approach facilitates the study of multiple genome-wide epigenomic profiles, considering network topology and allowing the comparison of chromatin interaction networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 195 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 29%
Researcher 51 24%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Professor 14 7%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 79 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 35%
Computer Science 23 11%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 20 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#638,931
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#395
of 4,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,514
of 371,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.