↓ Skip to main content

Protective effect of pioglitazone on morphine-induced neuroinflammation in the rat lumbar spinal cord

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective effect of pioglitazone on morphine-induced neuroinflammation in the rat lumbar spinal cord
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12929-015-0187-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Charkhpour, Hamed Ghavimi, Saeed Ghanbarzadeh, Bahman Yousefi, Arash Khorrami, Mehran Mesgari, Kambiz Hassanzadeh

Abstract

Morphine-induced tolerance is associated with the spinal neuroinflammation. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of oral administration of the pioglitazone, the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist, on the morphine-induced neuroinflammation in the lumbar region of the male Wistar rat spinal cord. Co-administration of the pioglitazone with morphine not only attenuated morphine-induced tolerance, but also prevented the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1beta, and interleukin 6) and nuclear factor-kappa B activity. Administration of the GW-9662 antagonized the above mentioned effects of the pioglitazone. It is concluded that oral administration of the pioglitazone attenuates morphine-induced tolerance and the neuroinflammation in the lumbar region of the rat spinal cord. This action of the pioglitazone may be, at least in part, due to an interaction with the spinal pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and the nuclear factor-kappa B activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Egypt 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#969
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,144
of 286,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.