You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Walking the talk: evaluating the alignment between Australian governments’ stated principles for working in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health contexts and health evaluation practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09983-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne N. Luke, Angeline S. Ferdinand, Yin Paradies, Daniel Chamravi, Margaret Kelaher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,581,611
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,988
of 15,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,035
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#163
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.