You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of tutored group with tutorless group in problem-based mixed learning sessions: a randomized cross-matched study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shogo Hayashi, Koji Tsunekawa, Chikako Inoue, Yoshitaka Fukuzawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,881,002
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#638
of 3,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,709
of 309,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.