You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Penicillin and cephalosporin cross‐reactivity: role of side chain and synthetic cefadroxil epitopes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-020-00368-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gador Bogas, Cristobalina Mayorga, Ángela Martín-Serrano, Rubén Fernández-Santamaría, Isabel M. Jiménez-Sánchez, Adriana Ariza, Esther Barrionuevo, Teresa Posadas, María Salas, Tahía Diana Fernández, María José Torres, María Isabel Montañez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Romania | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 29% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,587,965
of 24,976,442 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#280
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,056
of 521,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,976,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.