| Title |
Comparison of two ASC-derived therapeutics in an in vitro OA model: secretome versus extracellular vesicles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13287-020-02035-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiara Giannasi, Stefania Niada, Cinzia Magagnotti, Enrico Ragni, Annapaola Andolfo, Anna Teresa Brini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,143,380
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#883
of 2,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,187
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#26
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.