You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Layer-specific strain in patients with heart failure using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: not all layers are the same
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00680-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lingyu Xu, Joseph J. Pagano, Mark J. Haykowksy, Justin A. Ezekowitz, Gavin Y. Oudit, Yoko Mikami, Andrew Howarth, James A. White, Jason R.B. Dyck, Todd Anderson, D. Ian Paterson, Richard B. Thompson, Kelly Narine, Jennifer Beck, Lisa Tanguay, Beverly Armstrong, Marleen Irwin, for the AB HEART Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,775,306
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,191
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395,904
of 520,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.