You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety and preliminary results of perioperative chemotherapy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for high-risk gastric cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-10-195 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wilson L Costa, Felipe J F Coimbra, Héber S C Ribeiro, Alessandro L Diniz, André Luís de Godoy, MariaDirleiFS Begnami, Milton J B Silva, Marcelo F Fanelli, Celso A L Mello |
Abstract |
Gastric cancer relapse occurs in about 30% of the patients treated with gastrectomy and D2-lymphadenectomy, mainly as distant or peritoneal metastases. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been associated with an improvement in survival and lower peritoneal recurrence, albeit with increased morbidity. The aim of this study is to report the preliminary results of the association of perioperative chemotherapy, radical surgery and HIPEC in high-risk gastric patients in a single institution. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Poland | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Materials Science | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,020
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,608
of 170,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#21
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.