| Title |
High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among symptomatic healthcare workers in a large university tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-020-05662-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Palamin Buonafine, Beatriz Nobre Monteiro Paiatto, Fabyano Bruno Leal, Samantha Faria de Matos, Camila Ohomoto de Morais, Giovanna Guazzelli Guerra, Marcus Vinicius Vidal Martuchelli, Danielle Bruna Leal Oliveira, Edison Luiz Durigon, Camila Pereira Soares, Erika Donizette Candido, Bruna Larotonda Telezynski, Marco Aurélio Palazzi Sáfadi, Flávia Jacqueline Almeida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,126,759
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,183
of 7,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,095
of 509,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#81
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.