You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous quality monitoring in the field: an evaluation of the performance of the Fio Deki Reader™ for rapid HIV testing in South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-020-4932-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lara Noble, Lesley Scott, Lynsey Stewart-Isherwood, Seponono John Molifi, Ian Sanne, Pedro Da Silva, Wendy Stevens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#284,721
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#68
of 7,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 381,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.