↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of allergic rhinitis during and outside the pollen season using mobile technology. A MASK study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of allergic rhinitis during and outside the pollen season using mobile technology. A MASK study
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13601-020-00342-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Bédard, X. Basagaña, J. M. Anto, J. Garcia-Aymerich, P. Devillier, S. Arnavielhe, A. Bedbrook, G. L. Onorato, W. Czarlewski, R. Murray, R. Almeida, J. A. Fonseca, J. Correia da Sousa, E. Costa, M. Morais-Almeida, A. Todo-Bom, L. Cecchi, G. De Feo, M. Illario, E. Menditto, R. Monti, C. Stellato, M. T. Ventura, I. Annesi-Maesano, I. Bosse, J. F. Fontaine, N. Pham-Thi, M. Thibaudon, P. Schmid-Grendelmeier, F. Spertini, N. H. Chavannes, W. J. Fokkens, S. Reitsma, R. Dubakiene, R. Emuzyte, V. Kvedariene, A. Valiulis, P. Kuna, B. Samolinski, L. Klimek, R. Mösges, O. Pfaar, S. Shamai, R. E. Roller-Wirnsberger, P. V. Tomazic, D. Ryan, A. Sheikh, T. Haahtela, S. Toppila-Salmi, E. Valovirta, V. Cardona, J. Mullol, A. Valero, M. Makris, N. G. Papadopoulos, E. P. Prokopakis, F. Psarros, C. Bachert, P. W. Hellings, B. Pugin, C. Bindslev-Jensen, E. Eller, I. Kull, E. Melén, M. Wickman, G. De Vries, M. van Eerd, I. Agache, I. J. Ansotegui, S. Bosnic-Anticevich, A. A. Cruz, T. Casale, J. C. Ivancevich, D. E. Larenas-Linnemann, M. Sofiev, D. Wallace, S. Waserman, A. Yorgancioglu, D. Laune, J. Bousquet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Psychology 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,178,151
of 19,430,502 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#279
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,315
of 462,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#38
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,430,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.