↓ Skip to main content

Intervention dose estimation in health promotion programmes: a framework and a tool. Application to the diet and physical activity promotion PRALIMAP trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intervention dose estimation in health promotion programmes: a framework and a tool. Application to the diet and physical activity promotion PRALIMAP trial
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karine Legrand, Emilie Bonsergent, Clotilde Latarche, Fabienne Empereur, Jean François Collin, Edith Lecomte, Evelyne Aptel, Nathalie Thilly, Serge Briançon

Abstract

Although the outcomes of health promotion and prevention programmes may depend on the level of intervention, studies and trials often fail to take it into account. The objective of this work was to develop a framework within which to consider the implementation of interventions, and to propose a tool with which to measure the quantity and the quality of activities, whether planned or not, relevant to the intervention under investigation. The framework and the tool were applied to data from the diet and physical activity promotion PRALIMAP trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Professor 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Psychology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,727
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,608
of 170,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.