↓ Skip to main content

A novel totivirus and piscine reovirus (PRV) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with cardiomyopathy syndrome (CMS)

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel totivirus and piscine reovirus (PRV) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with cardiomyopathy syndrome (CMS)
Published in
Virology Journal, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-7-309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Løvoll, Jannicke Wiik-Nielsen, Søren Grove, Christer R Wiik-Nielsen, Anja B Kristoffersen, Randi Faller, Trygve Poppe, Joonil Jung, Chandra S Pedamallu, Alexander J Nederbragt, Matthew Meyerson, Espen Rimstad, Torstein Tengs

Abstract

Cardiomyopathy syndrome (CMS) is a severe disease affecting large farmed Atlantic salmon. Mortality often appears without prior clinical signs, typically shortly prior to slaughter. We recently reported the finding and the complete genomic sequence of a novel piscine reovirus (PRV), which is associated with another cardiac disease in Atlantic salmon; heart and skeletal muscle inflammation (HSMI). In the present work we have studied whether PRV or other infectious agents may be involved in the etiology of CMS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 6 4%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,266,546
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#189
of 3,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,302
of 100,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.