You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Examination of the efficacy of acute L-alanyl-L-glutamine ingestion during hydration stress in endurance exercise
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-7-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jay R Hoffman, Nicholas A Ratamess, Jie Kang, Stephanie L Rashti, Neil Kelly, Adam M Gonzalez, Michael Stec, Steven Anderson, Brooke L Bailey, Linda M Yamamoto, Lindsay L Hom, Brian R Kupchak, Avery D Faigenbaum, Carl M Maresh |
Abstract |
The effect of acute L-alanyl-L-glutamine (AG; Sustamine) ingestion on performance changes and markers of fluid regulation, immune, inflammatory, oxidative stress, and recovery was examined in response to exhaustive endurance exercise, during and in the absence of dehydration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 119 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 23% |
Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 27 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,573,063
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#565
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,357
of 436,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#550
of 854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.