| Title |
Viral RNA load in plasma is associated with critical illness and a dysregulated host response in COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03398-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesús F. Bermejo-Martin, Milagros González-Rivera, Raquel Almansa, Dariela Micheloud, Ana P. Tedim, Marta Domínguez-Gil, Salvador Resino, Marta Martín-Fernández, Pablo Ryan Murua, Felipe Pérez-García, Luis Tamayo, Raúl Lopez-Izquierdo, Elena Bustamante, César Aldecoa, José Manuel Gómez, Jesús Rico-Feijoo, Antonio Orduña, Raúl Méndez, Isabel Fernández Natal, Gregoria Megías, Montserrat González-Estecha, Demetrio Carriedo, Cristina Doncel, Noelia Jorge, Alicia Ortega, Amanda de la Fuente, Félix del Campo, José Antonio Fernández-Ratero, Wysali Trapiello, Paula González-Jiménez, Guadalupe Ruiz, Alyson A. Kelvin, Ali Toloue Ostadgavahi, Ruth Oneizat, Luz María Ruiz, Iria Miguéns, Esther Gargallo, Ioana Muñoz, Sara Pelegrin, Silvia Martín, Pablo García Olivares, Jamil Antonio Cedeño, Tomás Ruiz Albi, Carolina Puertas, Jose Ángel Berezo, Gloria Renedo, Rubén Herrán, Juan Bustamante-Munguira, Pedro Enríquez, Ramón Cicuendez, Jesús Blanco, Jesica Abadia, Julia Gómez Barquero, Nuria Mamolar, Natalia Blanca-López, Luis Jorge Valdivia, Belén Fernández Caso, María Ángeles Mantecón, Anna Motos, Laia Fernandez-Barat, Ricard Ferrer, Ferrán Barbé, Antoni Torres, Rosario Menéndez, José María Eiros, David J. Kelvin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 95 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 100 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#325,742
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#165
of 6,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,100
of 528,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.