| Title |
Potential causal factors of CFS/ME: a concise and systematic scoping review of factors researched
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02665-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley Elizabeth Muller, Kari Tveito, Inger Johanne Bakken, Signe A. Flottorp, Siri Mjaaland, Lillebeth Larun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#903,327
of 23,463,424 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#167
of 4,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,067
of 507,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#9
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,463,424 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.