↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students
Published in
BMC Medical Education, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12909-020-02403-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charle André Viljoen, Rob Scott Millar, Kathryn Manning, Vanessa Celeste Burch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Lecturer 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 55 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 61 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,659,831
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,323
of 3,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,551
of 509,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#85
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.