↓ Skip to main content

Ligation and mucopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids – a ten year experience

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ligation and mucopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids – a ten year experience
Published in
Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/1750-1164-2-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pravin J Gupta, Surekha Kalaskar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2010.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#8
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,359
of 167,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them