↓ Skip to main content

Intronic RNAs constitute the major fraction of the non-coding RNA in mammalian cells

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intronic RNAs constitute the major fraction of the non-coding RNA in mammalian cells
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georges St Laurent, Dmitry Shtokalo, Michael R Tackett, Zhaoqing Yang, Tatyana Eremina, Claes Wahlestedt, Silvio Urcuqui-Inchima, Bernd Seilheimer, Timothy A McCaffrey, Philipp Kapranov

Abstract

The function of RNA from the non-coding (the so called "dark matter") regions of the genome has been a subject of considerable recent debate. Perhaps the most controversy is regarding the function of RNAs found in introns of annotated transcripts, where most of the reads that map outside of exons are usually found. However, it has been reported that the levels of RNA in introns are minor relative to those of the corresponding exons, and that changes in the levels of intronic RNAs correlate tightly with that of adjacent exons. This would suggest that RNAs produced from the vast expanse of intronic space are just pieces of pre-mRNAs or excised introns en route to degradation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Italy 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 163 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 29%
Researcher 48 27%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 22%
Computer Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,309,442
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#600
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,586
of 190,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.