↓ Skip to main content

Epilepsy care guidelines for low- and middle- income countries: From WHO mental health GAP to national programs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epilepsy care guidelines for low- and middle- income countries: From WHO mental health GAP to national programs
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juri Katchanov, Gretchen L Birbeck

Abstract

In 2011, the World Health Organization's (WHO) mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) released evidence-based epilepsy-care guidelines for use in low and middle income countries (LAMICs). From a geographical, sociocultural, and political perspective, LAMICs represent a heterogenous group with significant differences in the epidemiology, etiology, and perceptions of epilepsy. Successful implementation of the guidelines requires local adaptation for use within individual countries. For effective implementation and sustainability, the sense of ownership and empowerment must be transferred from the global health authorities to the local people. Sociocultural and financial barriers that impede the implementation of the guidelines should be identified and ameliorated. Impact assessment and program revisions should be planned and a budget allocated to them. If effectively implemented, as intended, at the primary-care level, the mhGAP guidelines have the potential to facilitate a substantial reduction in the epilepsy treatment gap and improve the quality of epilepsy care in resource-limited settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 38%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,710,825
of 24,654,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,573
of 3,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,628
of 177,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.