Selected abstracts of “Bioinformatics: from Algorithms to Applications 2020” conference
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2020
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||17%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||17%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 476,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.